through July 30, 2016
by Shera Cohen
What happens when a staunch Democrat, a loyal Republican, and Miss Georgia occupy the same room? Now, let’s go backward approximately 200 years. What happens when James Monroe, Thomas Jefferson, and a prim and proper southern gent (sorry, couldn’t catch the name) meet in yet another room? In the case of Lauren Gunderson’s “The Taming,” both scenarios mix and confuse politics with intent, along with lot of laughs.
What happens when a staunch Democrat, a loyal Republican, and Miss Georgia occupy the same room? Now, let’s go backward approximately 200 years. What happens when James Monroe, Thomas Jefferson, and a prim and proper southern gent (sorry, couldn’t catch the name) meet in yet another room? In the case of Lauren Gunderson’s “The Taming,” both scenarios mix and confuse politics with intent, along with lot of laughs.
The play’s title, supposedly related to Shakespeare’s “The Taming of the Shrew” is a misnomer. The script is by no means Elizabethan or shrewish. Aside from the heading, Shakespeare & Co. presents an edgy piece of present-day and Revolutionary-era intellectually sound political bantering. It helps audience members appreciate the dialogue if they are attuned to this year’s presidential election. Most of us are. Yet, in spite of having learned decades ago from textbooks about the successes, points of view, and compromises of our Founding Fathers, it is safe to say that many playgoers have forgotten a lot of the history. No matter. The trio of actresses brush up our memory.
![]() |
Photo by Enrico Spada |
By no means is “The Taming” a straight forward comedy. Countless undertones and overt insults about the 200-year gap between then and now, between resolve and reality, are at the crux of the plot. Think “Electoral College” – perhaps a smart idea in 1789. But now?